美式 vs 欧式期权:提前行权与套利
American vs. European Options
题目详情
A. 为什么无分红股票上的美式看涨在到期前从不最优提前行权?
B. 同一无分红标的:欧式看跌 的价格为 8, 的价格为 9。是否存在套利?
A. “American options can be exercised earlier, so they are often more valuable than European with the same features. But for a non-dividend-paying stock, an American call and a European call should be worth the same, because early exercise is never optimal. Why never exercise an American call on a nondividend-paying stock before maturity?”
B. “A European put with strike=80 is priced at 8; a European put with strike=90 is priced at 9, same underlying no dividend. Is there an arbitrage?”
解析
A. 无分红时,美式看涨不提前行权:
- 提前行权只能拿到内在价值 ,但看涨在到期前通常具有正的时间价值。
- 更优做法是卖出期权而不是行权(保留时间价值);严格证明可用组合支配或风险中性下凸性(Jensen)论证。
B. 有套利。看跌价格对 应当是凸的且单调递增。给定价格 与 违反凸性(80 的太贵)。
一种套利:
- 做多 8 份 的看跌,
- 做空 9 份 的看跌。
初始成本为 0(),到期支付非负且在某些 下严格为正。
Original Explanation
AnswerA:
- By exercising the call early, you only get the intrinsic value. But a call’s time value is positive for a nondividend-paying stock. So you would sell the call in the market rather than exercise early.
- Detailed portfolio argument: If at , compare the immediate exercise vs. continuing to hold. A combination of short stock plus a borrowed fraction of the strike strictly dominates early exercise.
- Mathematical approach with risk-neutral valuation and Jensen’s inequality: The payoff is convex in . In the risk-neutral measure, the discounted expected payoff is always greater than the immediate-exercise value.
AnswerB:
A put payoff is convex in . Because a put with is worthless, the slope at suggests the price function in is convex from 0. Then from convexity we get
Hence the 80-strike put is overpriced.
Construct an arbitrage: go long 8 of the 90-strike puts, short 9 of the 80-strike puts. Initial cost is zero, final payoff is always and sometimes .