HMMT 二月 2017 · ALGNT 赛 · 第 6 题
HMMT February 2017 — ALGNT Round — Problem 6
题目详情
英文原题
- A polynomial P of degree 2015 satisfies the equation P ( n ) = for n = 1 , 2 , . . . , 2016. Findn 2
b 2017 P (2017) c .
解析
英文解析
- A polynomial P of degree 2015 satisfies the equation P ( n ) = for n = 1 , 2 , . . . , 2016. Findn 2
b 2017 P (2017) c .
Proposed by: Alexander Katz
Answer: − 9
2 2
Let Q ( x ) = x P ( x ) − 1. Then Q ( n ) = n P ( n ) − 1 = 0 for n = 1 , 2 , . . . , 2016, and Q has degree 2017.
Thus we may write
Q ( x ) = x P ( x ) − 1 = ( x − 1)( x − 2) . . . ( x − 2016) L ( x )2
where L ( x ) is some linear polynomial. Then Q (0) = − 1 = ( − 1)( − 2) . . . ( − 2016) L (0), so L (0) = − .1
2016!
Now note that
′ 2 ′
Q ( x ) = x P ( x ) + 2 x p ( x )
2016
∑
′
= ( x − 1) . . . ( x − ( i − 1))( x − ( i + 1)) . . . ( x − 2016) L ( x ) + ( x − 1)( x − 2) . . . ( x − 2016) L ( x )
i =1
Thus
( )
2016! 2016! 2016!
′ ′
Q (0) = 0 = L (0) + + . . . + + 2016! L (0) − 1 − 2 − 2016
( )
1 1 1 H
′
2016
whence L (0) = L (0) + + . . . + = − , where H denotes the n th harmonic number.
1 2 2016 2016!n
H x +1
2016
As a result, we have L ( x ) = − . Then
2016!
( )
2017 H + 1
2016
Q (2017) = 2017 P (2017) − 1 = 2016! −2
2016!
which is − 2017 H − 1. Thus
2016 − H
2016
P (2017) = .
2017
From which we get 2017 P (2017) = − H . It remains to approximate H . We alter the well known
2016 2016
approximation
∫
1 n
H ≈ dx = log xn
1 xto
∫
1 1 1 1 n
H ≈ 1 + + dx = 1 + + log(2016) − log(3) ≈ log(2016) +
2 x 2 2 nso that it suffices to lower bound log(2016). Note that e ≈ 20, which is close enough for our purposes.33
6 7 3 5 0 . 6 7 . 6
Then e ≈ 400 = ⇒ e ≈ 1080, and e ≈ 20 < 2 = ⇒ e << 2 = ⇒ e < 2016, so thatlog(2016) > 7 . 6. It follows that H ≈ log(2016) + 0 . 5 = 7 . 6 + 0 . 5 > 8 (of course these are loose
2016
estimates, but more than good enough for our purposes). Thus − 9 < 2017 P (2017) < − 8, making ouranswer − 9 .
Alternatively, a well-read contestant might know that H ≈ log n + γ , where γ ≈ . 577 is the Eulern
Mascheroni constant. The above solution essentially approximates γ as 0 . 5 which is good enough forour purposes.