返回题库

HMMT 二月 2011 · TEAM1 赛 · 第 9 题

HMMT February 2011 — TEAM1 Round — Problem 9

专题
Contest Math / 竞赛数学
难度
L3
来源
HMMT

题目详情

英文原题

  1. [ 15 ] We would now like to examine the behavior of p ( k ) as m becomes arbitrarily large; specifimcally, we would like to discern whether lim p (0) exists and, if it does, to determine its value. Letmm →∞
    lim p ( k ) = A .
    m km →∞
    (a) [ 5 ] Prove that p ( k ) ≥ p ( k + 2) for all m and k .2
    m m
    (b) [ 10 ] Prove that A exists and that A > 0. Feel free to assume the result of analysis that a 3
    0 0
    non-increasing sequence of real numbers that is bounded below by a constant c converges to alimit that is greater than or equal to c .
解析

英文解析

  1. [ 15 ] We would now like to examine the behavior of p ( k ) as m becomes arbitrarily large; specifimcally, we would like to discern whether lim p (0) exists and, if it does, to determine its value. Letmm →∞
    lim p ( k ) = A .
    m km →∞
    (a) [ 5 ] Prove that p ( k ) ≥ p ( k + 2) for all m and k .2
    m m
    (b) [ 10 ] Prove that A exists and that A > 0. Feel free to assume the result of analysis that a 3
    0 0
    non-increasing sequence of real numbers that is bounded below by a constant c converges to alimit that is greater than or equal to c .
    Solution:
    (a) We proceed by induction.
    2 2 3 1 1
    Base Case: When n = 1, we get p (0) = · = > = p (2). And since p (2 k ) = 0 for k ≥ 2,
    1 1 1
    3 3 4 2 4
    we get p ( k ) ≥ p ( k + 2) for all k .2
    1 1
    2 23
    Induction Step: Assume that p ( k ) ≥ p ( k + 2) for all i ≤ n . This clearly implies p ( k ) ≥
    i i n +1
    3 3
    p ( k + 2) for all k ≥ 4 by the formula (c) from the previous problem.
    n +1
    Now, for k = 2,
    ( )
    2 2 1 3 3 1
    p (2) = p (0) + p (2) + p (4) + p (6)
    n +1 n n n n
    3 3 4 8 8 8
    ≥ p (0) + p (4)1
    n n +1
    ≥ p (4)12
    n +1
    by the formula (b) from the previous problem and our induction hypothesis.
    For k = 0, we write out formula (a) from the previous problem.
    ( )
    2 2 3 1 1
    p (0) = p (0) + p (2) + p (4)
    n +1 n n n
    3 3 4 2 8
    1 3 1 1
    ≥ p (0) + p (2) + p (4) + p (6)
    n n n n
    4 8 2 8
    Team Round A
    1 3 3 1
    by our induction hypothesis. But p (2) = p (0) + p (2) + p (4) + p (6), which is clearlyn +1 n n n n
    4 8 8 8
    less than the last line above. Thus p (0) ≥ p (2). This completes the induction step.2
    n +1 n +1
    Remark: This is nowhere near the strongest bound. We intentionally asked for a bound strong 3
    enough to be helpful in part b, but not strong enough to help with other problems. The strongest
    √
    √
    2+ 5
    bound is p (0) ≥ p (2) and p (2 k ) ≥ (2 + 5) p (2 k + 2) for k ≥ 1. This is intuitive becausen n n n
    √2
    √
    2+ 5
    A = A and for k ≥ 1, A = (2 + 5) A .
    0 2 2 k 2 k +2
    2 k 2
    (b) For any n and k , p (2 k ) ≤ ( ) p (0). Nown n
    ( )3
    ∞ ∞
    ∑ ∑k
    1 = p (2 k ) ≤ p (0) = 3 p (0) .2
    n n nk =0 k =03
    So p (0) ≥ for all n . This means p (0) is a non-increasing sequence that is bounded below by 1
    n n
    1 13
    . So A exists and A ≥ > 0.
    0 0
    3 3