HMMT 二月 2011 · TEAM1 赛 · 第 9 题
HMMT February 2011 — TEAM1 Round — Problem 9
题目详情
英文原题
- [ 15 ] We would now like to examine the behavior of p ( k ) as m becomes arbitrarily large; specifimcally, we would like to discern whether lim p (0) exists and, if it does, to determine its value. Letmm →∞
lim p ( k ) = A .
m km →∞
(a) [ 5 ] Prove that p ( k ) ≥ p ( k + 2) for all m and k .2
m m
(b) [ 10 ] Prove that A exists and that A > 0. Feel free to assume the result of analysis that a 3
0 0
non-increasing sequence of real numbers that is bounded below by a constant c converges to alimit that is greater than or equal to c .
解析
英文解析
- [ 15 ] We would now like to examine the behavior of p ( k ) as m becomes arbitrarily large; specifimcally, we would like to discern whether lim p (0) exists and, if it does, to determine its value. Letmm →∞
lim p ( k ) = A .
m km →∞
(a) [ 5 ] Prove that p ( k ) ≥ p ( k + 2) for all m and k .2
m m
(b) [ 10 ] Prove that A exists and that A > 0. Feel free to assume the result of analysis that a 3
0 0
non-increasing sequence of real numbers that is bounded below by a constant c converges to alimit that is greater than or equal to c .
Solution:
(a) We proceed by induction.
2 2 3 1 1
Base Case: When n = 1, we get p (0) = · = > = p (2). And since p (2 k ) = 0 for k ≥ 2,
1 1 1
3 3 4 2 4
we get p ( k ) ≥ p ( k + 2) for all k .2
1 1
2 23
Induction Step: Assume that p ( k ) ≥ p ( k + 2) for all i ≤ n . This clearly implies p ( k ) ≥
i i n +1
3 3
p ( k + 2) for all k ≥ 4 by the formula (c) from the previous problem.
n +1
Now, for k = 2,
( )
2 2 1 3 3 1
p (2) = p (0) + p (2) + p (4) + p (6)
n +1 n n n n
3 3 4 8 8 8
≥ p (0) + p (4)1
n n +1
≥ p (4)12
n +1
by the formula (b) from the previous problem and our induction hypothesis.
For k = 0, we write out formula (a) from the previous problem.
( )
2 2 3 1 1
p (0) = p (0) + p (2) + p (4)
n +1 n n n
3 3 4 2 8
1 3 1 1
≥ p (0) + p (2) + p (4) + p (6)
n n n n
4 8 2 8
Team Round A
1 3 3 1
by our induction hypothesis. But p (2) = p (0) + p (2) + p (4) + p (6), which is clearlyn +1 n n n n
4 8 8 8
less than the last line above. Thus p (0) ≥ p (2). This completes the induction step.2
n +1 n +1
Remark: This is nowhere near the strongest bound. We intentionally asked for a bound strong 3
enough to be helpful in part b, but not strong enough to help with other problems. The strongest
√
√
2+ 5
bound is p (0) ≥ p (2) and p (2 k ) ≥ (2 + 5) p (2 k + 2) for k ≥ 1. This is intuitive becausen n n n
√2
√
2+ 5
A = A and for k ≥ 1, A = (2 + 5) A .
0 2 2 k 2 k +2
2 k 2
(b) For any n and k , p (2 k ) ≤ ( ) p (0). Nown n
( )3
∞ ∞
∑ ∑k
1 = p (2 k ) ≤ p (0) = 3 p (0) .2
n n nk =0 k =03
So p (0) ≥ for all n . This means p (0) is a non-increasing sequence that is bounded below by 1
n n
1 13
. So A exists and A ≥ > 0.
0 0
3 3