Solution 1 (complete)
This problem can be split into three parts, listed below:
Part 1: Analyzing Fractions
Let xk=bkak, where ak,bk are relatively prime positive integers. First, we analyze the moduli of the problem. Plugging in for x2 yields x2=275157. Notice that in both x1 and x2, the numerator is equivalent to 1 and the denominator is equivalent to 2 modulus 3. We see that x2=31⋅a1b1(a1−b1)2+a1b1. Specifically, we know that
(a1−b1)2+a1b1≡(1−2)2+1⋅2≡0(mod3)
Then this is always divisible by 3 for all xk (it can be shown that for all xk, we have ak≡1(mod3) and bk≡2(mod3) by using mod9). Thus, x2=a1b131((a1−b1)2+a1b1), and the numerator and denominator of the right-hand side (RHS) correspond to the numerator and denominator of x2 in simplest form. (To further prove that the top and bottom are relatively prime, consider that ak and bk are by definition relatively prime, so (ak−bk)2 and akbk share no factors.)
Notice that the above do not just apply to x1; we did not use any specific properties of x1. Then we may generalize the above, finding that:
ak=31((ak−1−bk−1)2+ak−1bk−1)
bk=ak−1bk−1
Summing the equations yields ak+bk=31(ak−1+bk−1)2 after some manipulation. Let zk=ak+bk; then zk=31zk−12. We are tasked with finding z2025.
Part 2: Recursion
We now need an explicit formula for zk. We can first experiment with the recursive formula:
zk=31zk−12=31(31zk−22)2=31(31(31zk−32)2)2
Notice that the inner 31 is acted upon by two consecutive powers of 2. This means that it contributes ((31)2)2=(31)4 to the value of zk. The next innermost 31 is acted upon by one power of 2, so it contributes (31)2 to the value of zk. Finally, the outermost 31 is acted upon by no powers of 2, so it contributes (31)1 to the value of zk. The overall power of 31 in zk in terms of zk−3 is then 4+2+1=22+21+20=23−1. Then, the overall power of 31 in zk in terms of zk−a is 2a−1 for positive integers a.
We also see that the zk−3 term is acted upon by 3 powers of 2, meaning that its power is 2⋅2⋅2=23. We can generalize this, so some zk−a term's power is then 2a.
If we combine the above, we obtain the formula zk=(31)2a−1zk−a2a. Setting k=a+1 results in
za+1=(31)2a−1z12a=362a⋅(31)2a−1
We can simplify this, noting that 362a=122a⋅32a:
za+1=122a⋅32a⋅(31)2a−1=3⋅122a
Finally, decrementing a+1 to a gives us our explicit equation:
za=3⋅122a−1
Part 3: Mod Bash
Noting that z2025=3⋅1222024, we are asked to find its value mod 1000. We can split mod 1000 into mod 125 and mod 8. We know that z2025≡0(mod8), so we must find its value mod 125.
We find that ϕ(125)=100, so by Euler's Totient Theorem we know that 12100≡1(mod125). Then, since the power of 12 is 22024, we must find this over modulus 100.
Again, we split mod 100 into mod 4 and mod 25. We know that 22024≡0(mod4). Since ϕ(25)=20, we can apply Euler again, finding that 220≡1(mod25). Then
22024≡(220)101⋅24≡24≡16(mod25)
Combining this with the mod 4 result yields 22024≡16(mod100).
Going back, 1222024≡1216(mod125). We can then decrement this using a series of simplifications:
1216≡1448≡198≡3614≡(−14)4≡1962≡(−54)2≡2916≡41(mod125)
Remember that the original value of z2025 included a multiplication of 3; thus,
z2025≡41⋅3≡123(mod125)
Finally, combining this with the fact that z2025≡0(mod8), we find that the solution to the system of moduli is z2025≡248(mod1000).
~eevee9406
Solution 2 (Faster)
Note that xk+1=31(xk(xk)2−xk+1). An astute reader might recognize the top part as one part of a sum of cubes. I multiplied the entire expression by xk+1, moved things around a bit, simplified, and was left with the following generalization: xk+1=3xk(xk+1)(xk)3+1. Now, we do the following: Set xk=nkmk. Therefore, xk+1=nk+1mk+1. We plug these expressions into the xk and xk+1 and simplify to get: nk+1mk+1=3(mk)(nk)(mk+nk)(mk)3+(nk)3. Now, as we are looking for the sum of the numerators and denominators of x2025, this is great! Now, recall that we want the fraction to be simplest. So we have to cancel out anything we can. Canceling out the factor of mk+nk from the numerator and denominator leaves us with nk+1mk+1=3(mk)(nk)(mk)2−(mk)(nk)+(nk)2. Now, adding the numerator and denominator as well as keeping the extra factor of 3, we get: 3(mk+1+nk+1)=(mk)2+2(mk)(nk)+(nk)2. Nicely, we get the recursion that mk+1+nk+1=3(mk+nk)2. Now, by listing out terms using this recursion and doing mod(1000), we get our answer of 248.
~ilikemath247365
Note: this works, but why are we able to add the numerator and denominator? What if one of the fractions is not fully simplified?
Answer: Because mk and nk are coprime, any prime factor p∣mk can not be a factor of (nk)2, any prime factor q∣nk can not be a factor of (mk)2. The only possible common factor of the numerator and denominator could be 3. However, a simple induction argument shows nk≡2mod3 and mk≡1mod3 for k>1. So this double recursion nk+1mk+1=(mk)(nk)31((mk)2−(mk)(nk)+(nk)2) is indeed the most simplified one.
~Rakko12
Video Solution
2025 AIME II #13
MathProblemSolvingSkills.com