AIME 2025 I · 第 15 题
AIME 2025 I — Problem 15
题目详情
Problem
Let denote the number of ordered triples of positive integers such that and is a multiple of . Find the remainder when is divided by .
解析
Solution 1
First, state the LTE Lemma for , which we might use.
$\bullet$ $\nu_3(n) = \begin{cases} \max \{k : 3^k \mid n\} &n\neq 0\\ \infty &n=0 \end{cases}$$\bullet$ If $3 \nmid x, 3\nmid y, 3\mid x+y$, then $\nu_3(x^3+y^3) = \nu_3(x+y) + \nu_3(3) = \nu_3(x+y) + 1$
$\bullet$ If $3 \nmid x, 3\nmid y, 3\mid x-y$, then $\nu_3(x^3-y^3) = \nu_3(x-y) + \nu_3(3) = \nu_3(x-y) + 1$Then we classify all cube numbers
$\bullet$ $A = \{a : 1\leq a \leq 3^6, 9\mid a\}$We can write $A = \{a: a=9k, 1\leq k \leq 3^4\}$, so $|A| = 3^4$.
$\bullet$ If $k \equiv 0 \mod{3}$, $k^3 \equiv 0 \mod{3}, a^3 \equiv 3^6k^3 \equiv 0 \mod{3^7}$, there are 27 roots.
$\bullet$ If $k \equiv 1 \mod{3}$, $k^3 \equiv 1 \mod{3}, a^3 \equiv 3^6k^3 \equiv 3^6 \mod{3^7}$, there are 27 roots.
$\bullet$ If $k \equiv 2 \mod{3}$, $k^3 \equiv 2 \mod{3}, a^3 \equiv 3^6k^3 \equiv 2\times 3^6 \mod{3^7}$, there are 27 roots.
$\bullet$ $B = \{a : 1\leq a \leq 3^6, 3\mid a, 9 \nmid a\}$We can write $B = \{a: a=9k+3 \text{ or }a=9k+6, 0\leq k < 3^4\}$, so $|B| = 2 \times 3^4$.For $x,y \in \{a: a=9k+3, 0\leq k < 3^4\}$, let $x = 3a, y= 3b$ and hence $3 \nmid a, 3\nmid b, 3\mid a-b$.
$(3a)^3 - (3b)^3 \equiv 0 \mod{3^7}$
$\iff a^3 - b^3 \equiv 0 \mod{3^4}$
$\iff \nu(a^3-b^3) \geq 4$
$\iff \nu(a-b) \geq 3$
$\iff a - b\equiv 0 \mod{3^3}$
$\iff x - y\equiv 0 \mod{3^4}$
For $k = 0, ..., 8$, each has 9 roots.
Since $(9k+3)^3 \equiv 3^6k^3+3^6k^2+3^5k + 3^3 \equiv 3^5m + 3^3 \mod{3^7}$, $0\leq m \leq 8$. They are the corresponding classes.Same apply to $x,y \in \{a: a=9k+6, 0\leq k < 3^4\}$. For $k = 0, ..., 8$, each has 9 roots.Since $(9k+6)^3 \equiv 3^6k^3+2\times3^6k^2+4\times3^5k + 8\times3^3 \equiv 3^5m - 3^3 \mod{3^7}$, $0\leq m \leq 8$. They are the corresponding classes.$\bullet$ $C = \{a : 1\leq a \leq 3^6, 3\nmid a\}$We write $C = \{a: a=3k+1 \text{ or }a=3k+2, 0\leq k < 3^5\}$, so $|C| = 2 \times 3^5$.For $a,b \in \{a: a=3k+1, 0\leq k < 3^5\}$, then $3 \nmid a, 3\nmid b, 3\mid a-b$.
$a^3 - b^3 \equiv 0 \mod{3^7}$
$\iff \nu(a^3-b^3) \geq 7$
$\iff \nu(a-b) \geq 6$
$\iff a - b\equiv 0 \mod{3^6}$
For $k = 0, ..., 3^5-1$, 1 root each.
$(3k+1)^3 \equiv 3^3k^3+3^3k^2+3^2k + 1 \equiv 3^2m + 1 \mod{3^7}$, $0\leq m < 3^5$. They are the corresponding classes.Same apply to $x,y \in \{a: a=3k+2, 0\leq k < 3^5\}$. For $k = 0, ..., 3^5-1$, 1 root each.$(3k+2)^3 \equiv 3^3k^3+2\times3^3k^2+4\times3^2k + 8 \equiv 3^2m - 1 \mod{3^7}$, $0\leq m < 3^5$. They are the corresponding classes.Summarized the results:
$\bullet$ $A$: If $x \equiv 0, 3^6, 2\times3^6 \mod{3^7}$, then $x$ has 27 roots. $|A| = 3^4$.
$\bullet$ $B$: If $x \equiv 3^5m \pm 3^3 \mod{3^7}$, then $x$ has 9 roots. $|B| = 2\times3^4$.
$\bullet$ $C$: If $x \equiv 3^2m \pm 1 \mod{3^7}$, then $x$ has 1 root. $|C| = 2\times3^5$.
$\bullet$ Otherwise, $x$ has no roots.We do the final combinatorial problem.
$\bullet$ Case: $A,A,A$: $|A| \times |A| \times 27 = \boxed{3 \times 3^{10}}$
$\bullet$ Case $A,A,B$: No solution.
$\bullet$ Case $A,A,C$: No solution.
$\bullet$ Case: $A,B,B$: $3 \times |A| \times |B| \times 9 = \boxed{6 \times 3^{10}}$
$\bullet$ Case $A,A,B$: No solution.
$\bullet$ Case: $A,C,C$: $3 \times |A| \times |C| \times 1 = \boxed{2 \times 3^{10}}$
$\bullet$ Case $B,B,C$: No solution.
$\bullet$ Case $B,B,B$: No solution.
$\bullet$ Case $B,C,C$: $3 \times |B| \times |C| \times 1 = \boxed{4 \times 3^{10}}$
$\bullet$ Case $C,C,C$: No solution.Total is .
Hence
Answer is .
~Rakko12
Solution 2 [Note: I think this solution has a critical flaw]
We are given that and we wish to compute the remainder when is divided by 1000.
Since and , the variables , , and range over the set .
A standard approach is to use exponential sums to detect the divisibility condition. For any integer we have the identity Thus, we can write Define Then,
Notice that when we have Thus, the term contributes
It turns out that for , one can show (using properties of cubic residues modulo ) that [Note: I don't believe this is true. Try it manually for the modulo case.]
Therefore, only the term contributes to the sum, and we obtain
Since we compute [Note: The multiplication by 5 isn't justified. The computed above is simply wrong by a factor of 5. Unfortunately, I don't know how to fix this approach.] (context: he chat gptd the solution like recently after the test was finished so we didnt know what the real answer was. i bashed with a simple program and determined his solution was off by a factor of 5 so he just did that at the end ;-;) ~shreyan.chethan
~hashbrown2009
~ zhenghua for minor fixes
~jrr for Notes on the flaw in the solution
Solution 3
For to happen, we need . So we can define classes:
If we consider class (1), we have and the others homogeneously. Then and . So . Then we need to choose another class so we choose class (1) again. Then and the other homogeneously. Then and . If we choose class (1) again, we would have satisfied the inequality and it would just be a number of multiples of between and so triples. Then we choose class (2) to get the number of numbers that are 1(mod 3) between and which is also . In fact, we would just have triples for each of the classes so triples for this case for (1)-(1) classes.
Now, if we choose class (1) again, then we would have and . But if we choose class (2) this time, then we would have and the others. Then . If we expand and simplify, we would have divides a number that is 1(mod 3) which is clearly impossible. Same thing for (1)-(3) class arrangement. So we can skip to (1)-(4) class.
So we start with and . Choosing class (4) gives . Expanding and simplifying we would need . Now, we would just need to do all residues modular 3 such that 3 divides the expression. We can classify them as:
If we consider the first case, then we have and the others. Notice . If we simplify with this knowledge and plug it into the original expression, we just need . Then, we would have to get solutions. We can keep going for and to get another solutions. In total, we have solutions after considering all and residues mod 3. But the value of doesn't matter so that generates another solutions. In total, we have solutions. Now, we move on to the next case. Choosing this case will give that where . So we need . Then simplifying gives . This yields which gives so . So and don't really matter for this case so we have possible pairs for . Then we need to count the number of numbers that are 2(mod 3) between 1 and 27 inclusive which is 9. So we have total triples for case 2. The next case yields solutions following similar logic. In fact, all the remaining classes each give solutions for a total of . But this is just for the class (1)-(4). Since classes (5),...,(9) are the same thing except it is just permutations of class (4), we will still generate the same number of solutions as (1)-(4) arrangement. So we would have classes each giving solutions for a total of solutions.
So we have completed all class (1) cases. Now we proceed to class (2). So if we start with class (2), then we have and homogeneously the others. Then, we have which is clearly impossible the expression is 1(mod 3). So we cannot begin with class (2). Similarly, we cannot begin with class (3). So we must proceed to class (4).
Starting with class (4) gives us that . So and . We would get . So we need at first. Following our logic by building on residues mod 3, we have:
Following case 1, we have . This part in essence is basically all the casework bash we did for class (1) arrangements except this time, the powers of 3 are higher. We have to substitute and consider classes mod 3 yet again(I won't go through all the steps here because it's pretty much similar to how we found the above cases). We end with total cases. This would happen for all classes (4),...,(9) so we have to multiply this by 6 to get cases. The casework we did here was based on (4)-(5) class arrangements, I didn't actually consider (4)-{(1),(2),(3)} class arrangements. Doing the casework for all those classes, we end up with cases(I won't repeat the steps here because it's practically the same thing, bashing all modular residues mod 3. Essentially we would get another copy of the and then doing the casework for (4)-(2) and (4)-(3), we would get options for a total of triples). Thus, we actually have total cases for these subclasses. And finally, we are ready to add these all up.
We have total from class (1) trivial arrangements. Then, we have total cases from the (1)-(4) arrangements e.t.c. And finally, we have cases from the (4)-{(5)...(9)} classes. We have . We can calculate this mod 1000 by simply noting because which tells us that the answer is just .
~ilikemath247365
Solution 4(Recursion)
Let equal to number of triples in the range for which . Define to be the number of triples such that and define to be the number of triples otherwise. It's obvious that . We can actually find a nice recursive definition for . We will replace which implies that the number of triples for this is simply since we lower the range by one exponent of since we're dividing all of by . Finding is a bit harder. Note that all the residues modulo that give are modulo and modulo and modulo . Note that if , then
which is impossible since the RHS is modulo . So the only residues that can work are are congruent to modulo with there being permutations. For now, we'll assume WLOG that and then multiply by at the end. By Hensel's Lemma, we have exactly one solution for in modulo so we can just count the number of triples.
For since , we have choices for . The same thing for with choices. Since we're in modulo for , we must have
.
Finally, we can evaluate
.
Note that we found a recursive definition for no if we plug in we have
. Note that by our definition of to evaluate we just need to find the number of triples such that . We can use Fermat's Little Theorem(which states that so this would imply all residues that satisfy ) or we can just list out all the residues. Ultimately, we get
can be congruent to permutation of modulo , permutation of and permutation of . Then permutations of giving total permutations each having possibilities. Thus we have
. Therefore, . Now we have just found we still need to find which by our definition is
Finally, the answer is which gives an answer of .
~ilikemath247365