AIME 2024 I · 第 13 题
AIME 2024 I — Problem 13
题目详情
Problem
Let be the least prime number for which there exists a positive integer such that is divisible by . Find the least positive integer such that is divisible by .
解析
Solution 1
If , then for some integer . But or , so it is impossible. Thus is an odd prime.
There are two ways to do the first part:
First Method using FLT. For integer such that , we have , hence , but . By Fermat's Little Theorem, , so \begin{equation*} p\mid\gcd\left(n^{p-1}-1,n^8-1\right)=n^{\gcd(p-1,8)}-1. \end{equation*} Here, mustn't be divide into or otherwise , which contradicts. So , and so . The smallest such prime is clearly .
Second Method using orders. Notice that the order modulo of must be , so . Hence , so . The smallest such prime is . ~eevee9406
So we have to find the smallest positive integer such that . We first find the remainder of divided by by doing \begin{array}{|c|cccccccccccccccc|} \hline \vphantom{\tfrac11}x\bmod{17}&1&2&3&4&5&6&7&8&9&10&11&12&13&14&15&16\\\hline \vphantom{\dfrac11}\left(x^4\right)+1\bmod{17}&2&0&14&2&14&5&5&0&0&5&5&14&2&14&0&2\\\hline \end{array} So , . If , let , by the binomial theorem, \begin{align*} 0&\equiv(17k+2)^4+1\equiv\mathrm {4\choose 1}(17k)(2)^3+2^4+1=17(1+32k)\pmod{17^2}\\[3pt] \implies0&\equiv1+32k\equiv1-2k\pmod{17}. \end{align*} So the smallest possible , and .
If , let , by the binomial theorem, \begin{align*} 0&\equiv(17k-2)^4+1\equiv\mathrm {4\choose 1}(17k)(-2)^3+2^4+1=17(1-32k)\pmod{17^2}\\[3pt] \implies0&\equiv1-32k\equiv1+2k\pmod{17}. \end{align*} So the smallest possible , and .
If , let , by the binomial theorem, \begin{align*} 0&\equiv(17k+8)^4+1\equiv\mathrm {4\choose 1}(17k)(8)^3+8^4+1=17(241+2048k)\pmod{17^2}\\[3pt] \implies0&\equiv241+2048k\equiv3+8k\pmod{17}. \end{align*} So the smallest possible , and .
If , let , by the binomial theorem, \begin{align*} 0&\equiv(17k-8)^4+1\equiv\mathrm {4\choose 1}(17k)(-8)^3+8^4+1=17(241-2048k)\pmod{17^2}\\[3pt] \implies0&\equiv241-2048k\equiv3+9k\pmod{17}. \end{align*} So the smallest possible , and .
In conclusion, the smallest possible is .
Solution by Quantum-Phantom
Solution 2 (Hensel's Lemma)
We know, from Solution 1, that by Fermat's Little Theorem, , and that the smallest satisfying such is . Thus, we have and we are attempting to lift modulo to modulo .
Given in the problem, it is established that holds true, so we can guarantee that . Testing for roots modulo gives us the solutions , , which satisfy .
Note that we can now use Hensel's Lemma, by defining a function , giving . We know firstly that, though for all roots we found is congruent to , this does not hold true for , so we guarantee that there is one lift by Hensel's Lemma to that we can perform, defined for root that . We now break our work into four cases:
- . and , so , and we need to find the inverse of modulo . By the extended Euclidean algorithm, we find that , and thus .
- , or equivalent, . and , so . We already found the inverse of modulo , so this case has .
- . and , so , and we need to find the inverse of modulo . We already know the inverse of is , so we end up with .
- , or equivalent, . and , so . We already found the inverse of modulo , so this case has .
Thus, out of our four values for , the smallest is . Solution by juwushu.
Solution 3 (Easy, given specialized knowledge)
Note that means The smallest prime that does this is and for example. Now let be a primitive root of The satisfying are of the form, So if we find one such , then all are Consider the from before. Note by LTE. Hence the possible are, Some modular arithmetic yields that is the least value.
~Aaryabhatta1
Solution 4 (Unfinished)
We work in the ring and use the formula
Since , the expression becomes , and it is easily calculated via Hensel that , thus giving an answer of .
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ambewDODiA
~MathProblemSolvingSkills.com
Video Solution 1 by OmegaLearn.org
https://youtu.be/UyoCHBeII6g
Video Solution 2
https://youtu.be/F3pezlR5WHc
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com)