Solution 1
Note that the given condition is equivalent to 3n≡1(mod1432) and 143=11⋅13. Because gcd(112,132)=1, the desired condition is equivalent to 3n≡1(mod121) and 3n≡1(mod169).
If 3n≡1(mod121), one can see the sequence 1,3,9,27,81,1,3,9... so 5∣n.
Now if 3n≡1(mod169), it is harder. But we do observe that 33≡1(mod13), therefore 33=13a+1 for some integer a. So our goal is to find the first number p1 such that (13a+1)p1≡1(mod169). Then, p1≡0(mod13), which follows from the binomial theorem. It is not difficult to see that the smallest p1=13, so ultimately 339≡1(mod169). Therefore, 39∣n.
The first n satisfying both criteria is thus 5⋅39=195.
-expiLnCalc
Solution 2
Note that Euler's Totient Theorem would not necessarily lead to the smallest n and that in this case that n is greater than 1000.
We wish to find the least n such that 3n≡1(mod1432). This factors as 1432=112∗132. Because gcd(121,169)=1, we can simply find the least n such that 3n≡1(mod121) and 3n≡1(mod169).
Quick inspection yields 35≡1(mod121) and 33≡1(mod13). Now we must find the smallest k such that 33k≡1(mod169). Euler's gives 3156≡1(mod169). So 3k is a factor of 156. This gives k=1,2,4,13,26,52. Some more inspection yields k=13 is the smallest valid k. So 35≡1(mod121) and 339≡1(mod169). The least n satisfying both is lcm(5,39)=195. (RegularHexagon)
Solution 3 (Big Bash)
Listing out the powers of 3, modulo 169 and modulo 121, we have:
n01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738393nmod169139278174531591397968351051461001315516515713361144212640120226629879210715211816481449411313nmod12113927811
The powers of 3 repeat in cycles of 5 and 39 in modulo 121 and modulo 169, respectively. The answer is lcm(5,39)=195.
~Minor edit by Yiyj1
Solution 4 (Order+Bash)
We have that
3n≡1(mod1432).
Now, 3110≡1(mod112) so by the Fundamental Theorem of Orders, ord112(3)∣110 and with some bashing, we get that it is 5. Similarly, we get that ord132(3)=39. Now, lcm(39,5)=195 which is our desired solution.
Solution 5 (Easy Binomial Theorem)
We wish to find the smallest n such that 3n≡1(mod1432), so we want n≡1(mod121) and n≡1(mod169). Note that 35≡1(mod121), so 3n repeats 121 with a period of 5, so 5∣n. Now, in order for n≡1(mod169), then n≡1(mod13). Because 33≡1(mod13), 3n repeats with a period of 3, so 3∣n. Hence, we have that for some positive integer p, 3n≡(33)p≡(26+1)p≡(0p)26p+(1p)26p−1....+(p−2p)262+(p−1p)26+(pp)≡26p+1≡1(mod169), so 26p≡0(mod169) and p≡0(mod13). Thus, we have that 5∣n, 3∣n, and 13∣n, so the smallest possible value of n is 3×5×13=195. -Stormersyle
Solution 6 (LTE)
We can see that 3n−1=1432∗x, which means that v11(3n−1)≥2, v13(3n−1)≥2. v11(3n−1)=v11(242)+v11(5n), v13(3n−1)=v13(26)+v13(3n) by the Lifting the Exponent lemma. From the first equation we gather that 5 divides n, while from the second equation we gather that both 13 and 3 divide n as v13(3n−1)≥2. Therefore the minimum possible value of n is 3×5×13=195.
-bradleyguo
Solution 7 (LTE, more in-depth)
As with the above solution, we are given 3n≡1(mod1432). From CRT, we can separate these into. 3n≡1(mod112) and 3n≡1(mod132).
(1) 3n≡1(mod112) Notice that for all n≡0(mod5), the given equivalency holds. Hence, 5∣n.
(2) 3n≡1(mod132). It is not exactly clear what n would be here. We turn to LTE.
First, note that 33≡1(mod13)⇒ν13(33−1)=1.
For LTE, if we use 3n−1n, then we would need an odd prime to divide 3−1=2, absurd. If we instead use 33n′−13n′ where n=3n′⟺n≡0(mod3), then we can apply LTE.
We have ν13((33)n′−(13)n′)=ν13(n′)+ν13(33−13)=ν13(n′)+1.
We need ν13((33)n′−(13)n′)≥2⇒ν13(n′)≥1. Hence, 13∣n.
All in all, we need 3,5,13∣n, and the minimum such value is 195.
~mathboy282
Solution 8
Note that the problem is basically asking for the least positive integer n such that 112⋅132∣3n−1. It is easy to see that n=lcm (a,b), where a is the least positive integer satisfying 112∣3a−1 and b the least positive integer satisfying 132∣3b−1. Luckily, finding a is a relatively trivial task, as one can simply notice that 35=243≡1mod121. However, finding b is slightly more nontrivial. The order of 3k modulo 13 (which is 3) is trivial to find, as one can either bash out a pattern of remainders upon dividing powers of 3 by 13, or one can notice that 33=27≡1mod13 (the latter which is the definition of period/orders by FLT). We can thus rewrite 33 as (2⋅13+1)mod132. Now suppose that
33k≡(13n+1)mod132.
I claim that 33(k+1)≡(13(n+2)+1)mod132.
Proof: To find 33(k+1), we can simply multiply 33k by 33, which is congruent to 2⋅13+1 modulo 132. By expanding the product out, we obtain
33(k+1)≡(13n+1)(2⋅13+1)=132⋅2n+13n+2⋅13+1mod132,
and since the 132 on the LHS cancels out, we're left with
13n+2⋅13+1mod132⟹13(n+2)+1mod132
. Thus, our claim is proven. Let f(n) be the second to last digit when 33k is written in base 132. Using our proof, it is easy to see that f(n) satisfies the recurrence f(1)=2 and f(n+1)=f(n)+2. Since this implies f(n)=2n, we just have to find the least positive integer n such that 2n is a multiple of 13, which is trivially obtained as 13. The least integer n such that 3n−1 is divisible by 132 is 3⋅13=39, so our final answer is lcm (5,39)=195.
-fidgetboss_4000 -minor edits made by srisainandan6
Solution 9 (Official MAA)
The requested positive integer is the least value of n>0 such that 3n≡1(mod1432). Note that 143=11⋅13. The least power of 3 that is congruent to 1 modulo 112 is 35=243=2⋅112+1. It follows that. 3n≡1(mod112) if and only if n=5j for some positive integer j.
The least power of 3 that is congruent to 1 modulo 13 is 33=27=2⋅13+1. It follows that 3n≡1(mod13) if and only if n=3k for some positive integer k. Additionally, for some positive integer k, the Binomial Theorem shows that 33k=(26+1)k=26⋅k+1(mod132). In particular, 3n=33k≡1(mod132) if and only if k=13m for some positive integer m, that is, if and only if n=39m.
Because 112 and 132 are relatively prime, 3n≡1(mod1432) if and only if 3n≡1(mod112) and 3n≡1(mod132). This occurs if and only if n is a multiple of both of the relatively prime integers 5 and 39, so the least possible value of n is 5⋅39=195.
Solution 10 (Motivation and LTE)
We first note that we wish to find 3n≡1(mod112) and 3n≡1(mod132). Not thinking of anything else, we try a few numbers for the first condition to get that 5∣n. For the second condition, upon testing up to 729, we find that it doesn't yield a solution readily, so we use Lifting the Exponent from our toolkit to get that
v13(27m−1m)=v13(26)+v(m)=1+v(m),3m=n
which clearly implies m=13 and 39∣n. Our answer is then obviously 39⋅5=195.
~Dhillonr25