The graphs y=3(x−h)2+j and y=2(x−h)2+k have y-intercepts of 2013 and 2014, respectively, and each graph has two positive integer x-intercepts. Find h.
解析
Solution 1
Begin by setting x to 0, then set both equations to h2=32013−j and h2=22014−k, respectively. Notice that because the two parabolas have to have positive x-intercepts, h≥32.
We see that h2=22014−k, so we now need to find a positive integer h which has positive integer x-intercepts for both equations.
Notice that if k=2014−2h2 is -2 times a square number, then you have found a value of h for which the second equation has positive x-intercepts. We guess and check h=36 to obtain k=−578=−2(172).
Following this, we check to make sure the first equation also has positive x-intercepts (which it does), so we can conclude the answer is 036.
Can someone explain the logic of guessing 36?
Solution 2
Let x=0 and y=2013 for the first equation, resulting in j=2013−3h2. Substituting back in to the original equation, we get y=3(x−h)2+2013−3h2.
Now we set y equal to zero, since there are two distinct positive integer roots. Rearranging, we get 2013=3h2−3(x−h)2, which simplifies to 671=h2−(x−h)2. Applying difference of squares, we get 671=(2h−x)(x).
Now, we know that x and h are both integers, so we can use the fact that 671=61×11, and set 2h−x=11 and x=61 (note that letting x=11 gets the same result). Therefore, h=036.
Note that we did not use the second equation since we took advantage of the fact that AIME answers must be integers. However, one can enter h=36 into the second equation to verify the validity of the answer.
Note on the previous note: we still must use the second equation since we could also use 671=671×1, yielding h=336. This answer however does not check out with the second equation which is why it is invalid.
Solution 3
Similar to the first two solutions, we deduce that (-)j and (-)k are of the form 3a2 and 2b2, respectively, because the roots are integers and so is the y-intercept of both equations. So the x-intercepts should be integers also.
The first parabola gives
3h2+j=3(h2−a2)=2013h2−a2=671
And the second parabola gives
2h2+k=2(h2−b2)=2014h2−b2=1007
We know that 671=11⋅61 and that 1007=19⋅53. It is just a fitting coincidence that the average of 11 and 61 is the same as the average of 19 and 53. That is 036.
To check, we have
(h−a)(h+a)=671=11⋅61(h−b)(h+b)=1007=19⋅53
Those are the only two prime factors of 671 and 1007, respectively. So we don't need any new factorizations for those numbers.
First, we expand both equations to get y=3x2−6hx+3h2+j and y=2x2−4hx+2h2+k. The y-intercept for the first equation can be expressed as 3h2+j. From this, the x-intercepts for the first equation can be written as
x=h±(−6h)2−4∗3(3h2+j)=h±36h2−12(2013)=h±36h2−24156
Since the x-intercepts must be integers, 36h2−24156 must also be an integer. From solution 1, we know h must be greater than or equal to 32. We can substitute increasing integer values for h starting from 32; we find that h=36.
We can test this result using the second equation, whose x-intercepts are
x=h±(−4h)2−4∗2(2h2+k)=h±16h2−8(2014)=h±16h2−16112
Substituting 36 in for h, we get h=36±68, which satisfies the requirement that all x-intercepts must be (positive) integers.
Thus, h=036.
Solution 5
We have the equation y=3(x−h)2+j.
We know: (x,y):(0,2013), so h2=2013/3−j/3 after plugging in the values and isolating h2. Therefore, h2=671−j/3.
Lets call the x-intercepts x1, x2. Since both x1 and x2 are positive there is a relationship between x1, x2 and h. Namely, x1+x2=2h. The is because: x1−h=−(x2−h),
Similarly, we know: (x,y):(x1,0), so j=−3(x1−h)2. Combining the two equations gives us
h2=671+(x1−h)2h2=671+x12−2x1h+h2h=(671+x12)/2x1.
Now since we have this relationship, 2h=x1+x2, we can just multiply the last equation by 2(so that we get 2h on the left side) which gives us
2h=671/x1+x12/x12h=671/x1+x1x1+x2=671/x1+x1x2=671/x1x1x2=671.
Prime factorization of 671 gives 11 and 61. So now we know x1=11 and x2=61. Lastly, we plug in the numbers,11 and 61, into x1+x2=2h, so h=36.
Solution 6 (Vieta's solution)
First, we start of exactly like solutions above and we find out that j=2013−3h2 and k=2014−2h2 We then plug j and k into 3(x−h)2+j and y=2(x−h)2+k respectively. After that, we get two equations, y=3x2−6xh+2013 and y=2x2−4xh+2014. We can apply Vieta's. Let the roots of the first equation be a,b and the roots of the second equation be c,d. Thus, we have that a⋅b=1007, a+b=2h and c⋅d=671, c+d=2h. Simple evaluations finds that h=36
~Jske25
Solution 7 (Copied from forums)
Note that the resulting quadratics can be rewritten as 3x2−6xh+2013 and 2x2−4xh+2014 respectively. Therefore by Vieta's there exist roots r1, r2 of the former quadratic and s1, s2 of the latter such that
r1+r2=s1+s2=2h,r1r2=671=61×11,ands1s2=1007=19×53.
It so happens that 61+11=19+53=72, so 2h=72⟹h=036.
Solution COPIED FROM ALCUMUS
Not my solution, please take it down if it violates rules but this is copied from Alcumus:
Setting x=0 in both equations, we get
2013=3h2+jand2014=2h2+k.
Solving for j and k, we can rewrite the given equations as
y=3(x−h)2+(2013−3h2)andy=2(x−h)2+(2014−2h2),
or
y=3x2−6xh+2013=3(x2−2hx+671) and y=2x2−4hx+2014=2(x2−2hx+1007).
The left equation has positive integer roots, which must multiply to 671 and sum to 2h. Similarly, the right equation has positive integer roots, which must multiply to 1007 and sum to 2h. Since 671=61⋅11 and 1007=19⋅53, we see that