返回题库

AIME 2014 I · 第 6 题

AIME 2014 I — Problem 6

专题
Contest Math
难度
L4
来源
AIME

题目详情

Problem 6

The graphs y=3(xh)2+jy=3(x-h)^2+j and y=2(xh)2+ky=2(x-h)^2+k have y-intercepts of 20132013 and 20142014, respectively, and each graph has two positive integer x-intercepts. Find hh.

解析

Solution 1

Begin by setting xx to 0, then set both equations to h2=2013j3h^2=\frac{2013-j}{3} and h2=2014k2h^2=\frac{2014-k}{2}, respectively. Notice that because the two parabolas have to have positive x-intercepts, h32h\ge32.

We see that h2=2014k2h^2=\frac{2014-k}{2}, so we now need to find a positive integer hh which has positive integer x-intercepts for both equations.

Notice that if k=20142h2k=2014-2h^2 is -2 times a square number, then you have found a value of hh for which the second equation has positive x-intercepts. We guess and check h=36h=36 to obtain k=578=2(172)k=-578=-2(17^2).

Following this, we check to make sure the first equation also has positive x-intercepts (which it does), so we can conclude the answer is 036\boxed{036}.

Can someone explain the logic of guessing 36?\textbf{Can someone explain the logic of guessing 36?}

Solution 2

Let x=0x=0 and y=2013y=2013 for the first equation, resulting in j=20133h2j=2013-3h^2. Substituting back in to the original equation, we get y=3(xh)2+20133h2y=3(x-h)^2+2013-3h^2.

Now we set yy equal to zero, since there are two distinct positive integer roots. Rearranging, we get 2013=3h23(xh)22013=3h^2-3(x-h)^2, which simplifies to 671=h2(xh)2671=h^2-(x-h)^2. Applying difference of squares, we get 671=(2hx)(x)671=(2h-x)(x).

Now, we know that xx and hh are both integers, so we can use the fact that 671=61×11671=61\times11, and set 2hx=112h-x=11 and x=61x=61 (note that letting x=11x=11 gets the same result). Therefore, h=036h=\boxed{036}.

Note that we did not use the second equation since we took advantage of the fact that AIME answers must be integers. However, one can enter h=36h=36 into the second equation to verify the validity of the answer.

Note on the previous note: we still must use the second equation since we could also use 671=671×1671=671\times1, yielding h=336.h=336. This answer however does not check out with the second equation which is why it is invalid.

Solution 3

Similar to the first two solutions, we deduce that (-)j\text{(-)}j and (-)k\text{(-)}k are of the form 3a23a^2 and 2b22b^2, respectively, because the roots are integers and so is the yy-intercept of both equations. So the xx-intercepts should be integers also.

The first parabola gives

3h2+j=3(h2a2)=20133h^2+j=3\left(h^2-a^2\right)=2013 h2a2=671h^2-a^2=671 And the second parabola gives

2h2+k=2(h2b2)=20142h^2+k=2\left(h^2-b^2\right)=2014 h2b2=1007h^2-b^2=1007 We know that 671=1161671=11\cdot 61 and that 1007=19531007=19\cdot 53. It is just a fitting coincidence that the average of 1111 and 6161 is the same as the average of 1919 and 5353. That is 036\boxed{036}.

To check, we have

(ha)(h+a)=671=1161(h-a)(h+a)=671=11\cdot 61 (hb)(h+b)=1007=1953(h-b)(h+b)=1007=19\cdot 53 Those are the only two prime factors of 671671 and 10071007, respectively. So we don't need any new factorizations for those numbers.

h+a=61,ha=11    (h,a)={36,25}h+a=61,h-a=11\implies (h,a)=\{36,25\} h+b=53,hb=19    (h,b)={36,17}h+b=53,h-b=19\implies (h,b)=\{36,17\}

Thus the common integer value for hh is 036\boxed{036}.

y=3(xh)2+jy=3(x11)(x61)=3x2216x+2013y=3(x-h)^2+j\rightarrow y=3(x-11)(x-61)=3x^2-216x+2013 y=2(xh)2+ky=2(x19)(x53)=2x2144x+2014y=2(x-h)^2+k\rightarrow y=2(x-19)(x-53)=2x^2-144x+2014

Solution 4

First, we expand both equations to get y=3x26hx+3h2+jy=3x^2-6hx+3h^2+j and y=2x24hx+2h2+ky=2x^2-4hx+2h^2+k. The yy-intercept for the first equation can be expressed as 3h2+j3h^2+j. From this, the x-intercepts for the first equation can be written as

x=h±(6h)243(3h2+j)=h±36h212(2013)=h±36h224156x=h \pm \sqrt{(-6h)^2-4*3(3h^2+j)}=h \pm \sqrt{36h^2-12(2013)}=h \pm \sqrt{36h^2-24156} Since the xx-intercepts must be integers, 36h224156\sqrt{36h^2-24156} must also be an integer. From solution 1, we know hh must be greater than or equal to 32. We can substitute increasing integer values for hh starting from 32; we find that h=36h=36.

We can test this result using the second equation, whose xx-intercepts are

x=h±(4h)242(2h2+k)=h±16h28(2014)=h±16h216112x=h \pm \sqrt{(-4h)^2-4*2(2h^2+k)}=h \pm \sqrt{16h^2-8(2014)}=h \pm \sqrt{16h^2-16112} Substituting 36 in for hh, we get h=36±68h=36 \pm 68, which satisfies the requirement that all x-intercepts must be (positive) integers.

Thus, h=036h=\boxed{036}.

Solution 5

We have the equation y=3(xh)2+j.y=3(x-h)^2 + j.

We know: (x,y):(0,2013)(x,y):(0,2013), so h2=2013/3j/3h^2=2013/3 - j/3 after plugging in the values and isolating h2h^2. Therefore, h2=671j/3h^2=671-j/3.

Lets call the x-intercepts x1x_1, x2x_2. Since both x1x_1 and x2x_2 are positive there is a relationship between x1x_1, x2x_2 and hh. Namely, x1+x2=2hx_1+x_2=2h. The is because: x1h=(x2h)x_1-h=-(x_2-h),

Similarly, we know: (x,y):(x1,0)(x,y):(x_1,0), so j=3(x1h)2j=-3(x_1-h)^2. Combining the two equations gives us

h2=671+(x1h)2h^2=671+(x_1-h)^2 h2=671+x122x1h+h2h^2=671+x_1^2-2x_1h+h^2 h=(671+x12)/2x1.h=(671+x_1^2)/2x_1. Now since we have this relationship, 2h=x1+x22h=x_1+x_2, we can just multiply the last equation by 2(so that we get 2h2h on the left side) which gives us

2h=671/x1+x12/x12h=671/x_1+x_1^2/x^1 2h=671/x1+x12h=671/x_1+x_1 x1+x2=671/x1+x1x_1+x_2=671/x_1+x_1 x2=671/x1x_2=671/x_1 x1x2=671.x_1x_2=671. Prime factorization of 671 gives 11 and 61. So now we know x1=11x_1=11 and x2=61x_2=61. Lastly, we plug in the numbers,11 and 61, into x1+x2=2hx_1+x_2=2h, so h=36\boxed{h=36}.

Solution 6 (Vieta's solution)

First, we start of exactly like solutions above and we find out that j=20133h2j=2013-3h^2 and k=20142h2k=2014-2h^2 We then plug j and k into 3(xh)2+j3(x-h)^2+j and y=2(xh)2+ky=2(x-h)^2+k respectively. After that, we get two equations, y=3x26xh+2013y=3x^2-6xh+2013 and y=2x24xh+2014y=2x^2-4xh+2014. We can apply Vieta's. Let the roots of the first equation be a,ba, b and the roots of the second equation be c,dc, d. Thus, we have that ab=1007a\cdot b=1007, a+b=2ha+b=2h and cd=671c\cdot d=671, c+d=2hc+d=2h. Simple evaluations finds that h=36\boxed{h=36}

~Jske25

Solution 7 (Copied from forums)

Note that the resulting quadratics can be rewritten as 3x26xh+20133x^2-6xh+2013 and 2x24xh+20142x^2-4xh+2014 respectively. Therefore by Vieta's there exist roots r1r_1, r2r_2 of the former quadratic and s1s_1, s2s_2 of the latter such that

r1+r2=s1+s2=2h,r1r2=671=61×11,ands1s2=1007=19×53.r_1+r_2=s_1+s_2=2h,\,\,\, r_1r_2=671=61\times 11,\,\,\,\text{and}\,\,\, s_1s_2=1007=19\times 53. It so happens that 61+11=19+53=7261+11=19+53=72, so 2h=72    h=0362h=72\implies h=\boxed{036}.

Solution COPIED FROM ALCUMUS

Not my solution, please take it down if it violates rules but this is copied from Alcumus:

Setting x=0x=0 in both equations, we get

2013=3h2+jand2014=2h2+k.2013 = 3h^2 + j \quad \text{and} \quad 2014 = 2h^2 + k. Solving for jj and k,k, we can rewrite the given equations as

y=3(xh)2+(20133h2)andy=2(xh)2+(20142h2),y = 3(x-h)^2 + (2013-3h^2) \quad \text{and} \quad y = 2(x-h)^2 + (2014-2h^2), or

y=3x26xh+2013=3(x22hx+671) and y=2x24hx+2014=2(x22hx+1007).y = 3x^2 - 6xh + 2013 = 3(x^2-2hx+671) \quad \text{ and } \quad y = 2x^2 - 4hx + 2014 = 2(x^2 - 2hx + 1007). The left equation has positive integer roots, which must multiply to 671671 and sum to 2h.2h. Similarly, the right equation has positive integer roots, which must multiply to 10071007 and sum to 2h.2h. Since 671=6111671 = 61 \cdot 11 and 1007=1953,1007 = 19 \cdot 53, we see that

2h=61+11=19+53=72,2h = 61 + 11 = 19 + 53 = 72, so h=36.h = \boxed{36}.