The equation 2000x6+100x5+10x3+x−2=0 has exactly two real roots, one of which is rm+n, where m, n and r are integers, m and r are relatively prime, and r>0. Find m+n+r.
解析
Solution
We may factor the equation as:[1]
2000x6+100x5+10x3+x−22(1000x6−1)+x(100x4+10x2+1)2[(10x2)3−1]+x[(10x2)2+(10x2)+1]2(10x2−1)[(10x2)2+(10x2)+1]+x[(10x2)2+(10x2)+1](20x2+x−2)(100x4+10x2+1)=0=0=0=0=0
Now 100x4+10x2+1≥1>0 for real x. Thus the real roots must be the roots of the equation 20x2+x−2=0. By the quadratic formula the roots of this are:
x=40−1±12−4(−2)(20)=40−1±1+160=40−1±161.
Thus the only root of the required form is x=40−1+161, and so the final answer is −1+161+40=200.
Another Note: One could have also determined that the imaginary roots lie with the polynomial 100x4+10x2+1 through Descartes Rule of Signs.
^ A well-known technique for dealing with symmetric (or in this case, nearly symmetric) polynomials is to divide through by a power of x with half of the polynomial's degree (in this case, divide through by x3), and then to use one of the substitutions t=x±x1. In this case, the substitution t=x10−x101 gives t2+2=10x2+10x21 and 210(t3+3t)=200x3−10x32, which reduces the polynomial to just (t2+3)(210t+1)=0. Then one can backwards solve for x. Note: After dividing the equation with x3, divide again with 10 before substituting it with t to get it right.
A slightly different approach using symmetry: Let y=10x−1/x. Notice that the equation can be rewritten (after dividing across by x3) as
2((10x)3−1/x3)+(10x)2+(1/x)2+10=0
Now it is easy to see that the equation reduces to
2(y3+30y)+(y2+20)+10=02y3+y2+60y+30=0y2(2y+1)+30(2y+1)=0(2y+1)(y2+30)=0
so for real solutions we have y=−1/2. Solve the quadratic in x to get the final answer as 200.
Solution 2 (Complex Bash)
It would be really nice if the coefficients were symmetrical. What if we make the substitution x=−10iy? Then the equation becomes
−2y6−(10i)y5+(10i)y3−(10i)y−2=0.
It's symmetric! Dividing by y3 and rearranging, we get
−2(y3+y31)−(10i)(y2+y21)+(10i)
Now, if we let z=y+y1, we can get the equations
z=y+y1z2−2=y2+y21
and
z3−3z=y3+y31
(These come from squaring z and subtracting 2 then multiplying that result by z and subtracting z.) Plugging this into our polynomial, expanding, and rearranging, we get
−2z3−(10i)z2+6z+(103i)
Now, we see that the two i terms must cancel in order to get this polynomial equal to 0, so what squared equals 3? Plugging in z=3 into the polynomial, we see that it works! Is there something else that equals 3 when squared? Trying z=−3, we see that it also works! Great, we use long division on the polynomial by
(z−3)(z+3)=z2−3 and we get
2z−(10i)=0.
We know that the other two solutions for z wouldn't result in real solutions for x since we have to solve a quadratic with a negative discriminant and then multiply by −(10i). We get that z=(−210i). Solving for y (using y+y1=z) we get that y=410−i±161i, and multiplying this by −(10i) (because x=−(10i)y) we get that x=40−1±161 for a final answer of −1+161+40=200.
~Grizzy ~formatting edits by fermat_sLastAMC
Solution 3 (Geometric Series)
Observe that the given equation may be rearranged as 2000x6−2+(100x5+10x3+x)=0. The expression in parentheses is a geometric series with common factor 10x2. Using the geometric sum formula, we rewrite as 2000x6−2+10x2−11000x7−x=0,10x2−1=0. Factoring a bit, we get 2(1000x6−1)+(1000x6−1)10x2−1x=0,10x2−1=0⟹(1000x6−1)(2+10x2−1x)=0,10x2−1=0. Note that setting 1000x6−1=0 gives 10x2−1=0, which is clearly extraneous. Hence, we set 2+10x2−1x=0 and use the quadratic formula to get the desired root x=40−1+161⟹−1+161+40=200
~keeper1098
Solution 4
If we look at the polynomial's terms, we can see that the number of zeros in a term more or less correlates to the power of x2. Thus, we let y=10x2. The equation then becomes 2y3+xy2+xy+x−2=0, or x(y2+y+1)=2(1−y3).
By the difference of cubes formula, 2(1−y3)=2(1−y)(1+y+y2), so we have two cases: either y2+y+1=0, or x=2(1−y). We start with the second formula as it is simpler.
Solving with the quadratic formula after re-substitution, we see that x=40−1±161, so the answer is −1+161+40=200.
For the sake of completeness, if we check the other equation, we come to the conclusion that y=2−1±i3, so no real solution exists for x. Thus our solution is correct.
~eevee9406
Solution 5 (substitutions)
Let x=10y. We have
1062000y6+105100y5+10310y3+10y−2=0=1032y6+103y5+102y3+10y−2⟺2y6+y5+10y3+100y−2000=0.
Divide this by y3, and we get
2y3+y2+10+y2100−y32000.
By inspection, this looks like it could be expressed as a polynomial in z=y−y10. First, let's express 2(y3−y31000) in terms of z. We have
z3=(y−y10)3=y3−30y+y300−y31000,⟺z3+30z=(y−y10)3+30(y−y10)=y3−y31000.
So,
2y3−y32000=2z3+60z.
Now we want to express y2+10+y2100 in terms of z too.
z2+30=y2−20+y2100+30=y2+10+y2100.
Finally,
2y3+y2+10+y2100−y32000=2z3+z2+60z+30.
It is quite easy to see that −21 is one of the roots of this polynomial. Since the problem specifies that there are exactly two real roots, we know that the other roots of this cubic are nonreal. Now, we backtrack.
z=−21=y−y10.y2+2y−10=02y2+y−20=04−1±1+160⟺y=4−1+161.
Since x=10y,x=40−1+161, which means our answer is