Solution
Solution 1
Let m be the number 100a+10b+c. Observe that 3194+m=222(a+b+c) so
m≡−3194≡−86≡136(mod222)
This reduces m to one of 136,358,580,802. But also a+b+c=2223194+m>2223194>14 so a+b+c≥15. Recall that a,b,c refer to the digits the three digit number (abc), so of the four options, only m=358 satisfies this inequality.
Solution 2
As in Solution 1, 3194+m≡222(a+b+c)(mod222), and so as above we get m≡136(mod222). We can also take this equation modulo 9; note that m≡a+b+c(mod9), so
3194+m≡222m⟹5m≡8⟹m≡7(mod9).
Therefore m is 7 mod 9 and 136 mod 222. There is a shared factor in 3 in both, but the Chinese Remainder Theorem still tells us the value of m mod 666, namely m≡358 mod 666. We see that there are no other 3-digit integers that are 358 mod 666, so m=358.
Solution 3
Let n=abc then
N=222(a+b+c)−n
N=222(a+b+c)−100a−10b−c=3194
Since 0<100a+10b+c<1000, we get the inequality
N<222(a+b+c)<N+1000
3194<222(a+b+c)<4194
14<a+b+c<19
Checking each of the multiples of 222 from 15⋅222 to 18⋅222 by subtracting N from each 222(a+b+c), we quickly find n=358
~ Nafer
Solution 4
The sum of the five numbers is 222(a+b+c)−100a−10b−c=122a+212b+221c=122(a+b+c)+9(10b+11c)=3194 We can see that 3194≡8 (mod 9) and 122≡5 (mod 9) so we need to make sure that a+b+c≡7 (mod 9) by some testing. So we let a+b+c=9k+7
Then, we know that 1≤a+b+c≤27 so only 7,16,25 lie in the interval
When we test a+b+c=25,10b+11c=16, impossible
When we test a+b+c=16,10b+11c=138,b=5,c=8,a=3
When we test a+b+c=7,10b+11c=260, well, it's impossible
The answer is 358 then
~bluesoul