足球比赛
Soccer Match
题目详情
和 两支球队在两场独立比赛中踢了两次足球。 队在第 1 场比赛中的平均射门准确度高于 队在第 1 场比赛中的平均射门准确度。
队在第 2 场比赛中的平均准确度也高于 队在第 2 场比赛中的平均准确度。
根据这些数据,我们是否可以得出结论, 队在两场比赛中的平均准确率大于 队的平均准确率?如果是,请解释原因。如果答案是否定的,请提供反例。
Two teams, and , played soccer twice in two independent matches. The average accuracy of shots taken by team in match 1 was greater than the average accuracy of shots taken by team in match 1.
The average accuracy of team in match 2 was also greater than the average accuracy of team in match 2.
Based on this data, can we conclude that the average accuracy of team is greater than the average accuracy of team in the two matches together? If yes, explain why. If the answer is no, provide a counter-example.
解析
我们不能得出这样的结论: 队两场比赛的平均准确度比 队更高。其原因是由于一种称为“辛普森悖论”的现象,即趋势出现在多组数据中,但当将各组数据组合在一起时,趋势就会消失或逆转。
让我们考虑以下示例。在第 1 场比赛中, 队的得分为 1 / 100,准确率为 1%, 队的得分为 0 / 1,准确率为 0%。在第 2 场比赛中, 队的得分为 1 / 1,准确度为 100%, 队的得分为 99 / 100,准确度为 99%。
在每场个人比赛中, 队伍的准确率高于 队伍,但 队伍的总体准确率为 ~1.98%, 队伍的总体准确率为 ~98%。
Original Explanation
We can not conclude that the average accuracy of the two matches together is greater for team than for team . The reason for this is due to phenomenon known as Simpson's paradox in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined.
Let's consider the following example. In match 1, team goes 1 / 100 giving them an accuracy of 1% and team goes 0 / 1, giving them an accuracy of 0%. In match 2, team goes 1 / 1, giving them an accuracy of 100%, and team goes 99 / 100 giving them an accuracy of 99%.
In each individual game, team has a better accuracy than team , but overall team has an accuracy of ~1.98% and team has an overall accuracy of ~98%.